Allocation of Parental Responsibilities, formerly known as child custody in Illinois, refers to the care, maintenance, and control of a minor child. Ward Family Law, LLC has represented many clients through custody cases and witnessed, first-hand, the impact of custodial conflict and work closely with clients to achieve the best results under the law. The law now requires that the court make determinations regarding “Parental Responsibility” rather than “Child Custody.” The law defines parental responsibility as including two factors: decision-making responsibilities and parenting time. We fully understand the importance that your child or children have in your life and we make it a priority for our clients to achieve the results that they believe are in the child’s best interest, for allocation of decision-making and parenting time.
Prior to Senate Bill 57, which went into effect on January 1, 2016, the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act allowed for custody to be allocated either solely or jointly (formerly entered into as Custody Judgments and Parenting Agreements). When a parent received sole custody, the other parent was entitled to child visitation, or set time to spend with his or her children. In addition, the law distinguished between legal custody, which gives the parent the right to make decisions regarding the child, and physical custody, which refers to where the child lives. In order to make a custody determination, courts took into account the best interests of the child by considering established, relevant factors.
According to Senate Bill 57, rather than making custody determinations, the court will be making determinations regarding parental responsibility. The law defines parental responsibility as including two factors: decision-making responsibilities and parenting time. The concept of “decision-making responsibilities” replaces the concept of legal custody and allocates the right to make decisions in four different areas to the parents. A parent may be entitled to make decisions in all four areas of the child’s life, or the court may determine that each parent is responsible for different areas. The statute requires parental responsibility to be allocated regarding decisions about the child’s education, health, religion, and extra-curricular activities.
Some of the new terms that are of significant importance, are defined by statute as follows:
- “Allocation Judgment” means a judgment allocating parental responsibilities.
- “Caretaking functions” means tasks that involve interaction with a child or that direct, arrange, and supervise the interaction with and care of a child provided by others, or for obtaining the resources allowing for the provision of these functions. The term includes, but is not limited to, the following: (1) satisfying a child’s nutritional needs; managing a child’s bedtime and wake-up routines; caring for a child when the child is sick or injured; being attentive to a child’s personal hygiene needs, including washing, grooming, and dressing; playing with a child and ensuring the child attends scheduled extracurricular activities; protecting a child’s physical safety; and providing transportation for a child; (2) directing a child’s various developmental needs, including the acquisition of motor and language skills, toilet training, self-confidence, and maturation; (3) providing discipline, giving instruction in manners, assigning and supervising chores, and performing other tasks that attend to a child’s needs for behavioral control and self-restraint; (4) ensuring the child attends school, including remedial and special services appropriate to the child’s needs and interests, communicating with teachers and counselors, and supervising homework; (5) helping a child develop and maintain appropriate interpersonal relationships with peers, siblings, and other family members; (6) ensuring the child attends medical appointments and is available for medical follow-up and meeting the medical needs of the child in the home; (7) providing moral and ethical guidance for a child; and (8) arranging alternative care for a child by a family member, babysitter, or other child care provider or facility, including investigating such alternatives, communicating with providers, and supervising such care.
- “Parental responsibilities” means both parenting time and significant decision-making responsibilities with respect to a child.
- “Parenting time” means the time during which a parent is responsible for exercising caretaking functions and non-significant decision-making responsibilities with respect to the child.
- “Parenting plan” means a written agreement that allocates significant decision-making responsibilities, parenting time, or both.
- “Relocation” means: (1) a change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in the county of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, or Will to a new residence within this State that is more than 25 miles from the child’s current residence; (2) a change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in a county not listed in paragraph (1) to a new residence within this State that is more than 50 miles from the child’s current primary residence; or (3) a change of residence from the child’s current primary residence to a residence outside the borders of this State that is more than 25 miles from the current primary residence.
- “Religious upbringing” means the choice of religion or denomination of a religion, religious schooling, religious training, or participation in religious customs or practices.
- “Significant decision-making” means deciding issues of long-term importance in the life of a child.
As previously mentioned, the law defines parental responsibility as including two factors: decision-making responsibilities and parenting time.
The determination of decision-making responsibilities is to be based on the best interests of the child and the court is required to consider relevant factors, including those outlined by the statute, as follows:
- The wishes of the child;
- The child’s adjustment to his or her home, school and community;
- The mental and physical health of all individuals involved;
- The ability of the parents to cooperate;
- Any prior agreement or conduct between the parents with regard to decision-making;
- The parents’ wishes;
- The child’s needs;
- The distance between the parents’ homes;
- The ability of each parent to support the child’s continued close relationship with the other parent;
- Physical violence against the child;
- Abuse in the home;
- Whether or not one parent is a sex offender; and
- Any other relevant factor.
In order to make a determination with regard to parenting time, the court is tasked with considering the child’s best interests; however, the list of factors for the court to consider is slightly different:
(1) the wishes of each parent seeking parenting time;
(2) the wishes of the child, taking into account the child’s maturity and ability to express reasoned and independent preferences as to parenting time;
(3) the amount of time each parent spent performing caretaking functions with respect to the child in the 24 months preceding the filing of any petition for allocation of parental responsibilities or, if the child is under 2 years of age, since the child’s birth;
(4) any prior agreement or course of conduct between the parents relating to caretaking functions with respect to the child;
(5) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his or her parents and siblings and with any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interests;
(6) the child’s adjustment to his or her home, school, and community;
(7) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved;
(8) the child’s needs;
(9) the distance between the parents’ residences, the cost and difficulty of transporting the child, each parent’s and the child’s daily schedules, and the ability of the parents to cooperate in the arrangement;
(10) whether a restriction on parenting time is appropriate;
(11) the physical violence or threat of physical violence by the child’s parent directed against the child or other member of the child’s household;
(12) the willingness and ability of each parent to place the needs of the child ahead of his or her own needs;
(13) the willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the other parent and the child;
(14) the occurrence of abuse against the child or other member of the child’s household;
(15) whether one of the parents is a convicted sex offender or lives with a convicted sex offender and, if so, the exact nature of the offense and what if any treatment the offender has successfully participated in; the parties are entitled to a hearing on the issues raised in this paragraph (15);
(16) the terms of a parent’s military family-care plan that a parent must complete before deployment if a parent is a member of the United States Armed Forces who is being deployed; and
(17) any other factor that the court expressly finds to be relevant.
If the parents’ reach an agreement on a parenting plan then it must be in writing and signed by both parents. The parents must submit the parenting plan to the court for approval within 120 days after service of a petition for allocation of parental responsibilities or the filing of an appearance, except for good cause shown. Notwithstanding the provisions above, the parents may agree upon and submit a parenting plan at any time after the commencement of a proceeding until prior to the entry of a judgment of dissolution of marriage. The agreement is binding upon the court unless it finds, after considering the circumstances of the parties and any other relevant evidence produced by the parties, that the agreement is unconscionable. If the court does not approve the parenting plan, the court shall make express findings of the reason or reasons for its refusal to approve the plan. The court, on its own motion, may conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the parenting plan is in the child’s best interests.
If the parents cannot reach an agreement on a parenting plan and fail to submit an agreed parenting plan, each parent must file and submit a written, signed parenting plan to the court within 120 days after the filing of an appearance, except for good cause shown.
At a minimum, a parenting plan must set forth the following:
(1) an allocation of significant decision-making responsibilities;
(2) provisions for the child’s living arrangements and for each parent’s parenting time, including either: (A) a schedule that designates in which parent’s home the minor child will reside on given days; or (B) a formula or method for determining such a schedule in sufficient detail to be enforced in a subsequent proceeding;
(3) a mediation provision addressing any proposed reallocation of parenting time or regarding the terms of allocation of parental responsibilities, except that this provision is not required if one parent is allocated all significant decision-making responsibilities;
(4) each parent’s right of access to medical, dental, and psychological records (subject to the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act), child care records, and school and extracurricular records, reports, and schedules, unless expressly denied by a court order or denied under subsection (g) of Section 602.5 of the IMDMA;
(5) a designation of the parent who will be denominated as the parent with the majority of parenting time;
(6) the child’s residential address for school enrollment purposes only;
(7) each parent’s residence address and phone number, and each parent’s place of employment and employment address and phone number;
(8) a requirement that a parent changing his or her residence provide at least 60 days prior written notice of the change to any other parent under the parenting plan or allocation judgment, unless such notice is impracticable or unless otherwise ordered by the court. If such notice is impracticable, written notice shall be given at the earliest date practicable. At a minimum, the notice shall set forth the following:
(A) the intended date of the change of residence; and
(B) the address of the new residence;
(9) provisions requiring each parent to notify the other of emergencies, health care, travel plans, or other significant child-related issues;
(10) transportation arrangements between the parents;
(11) provisions for communications, including electronic communications, with the child during the other parent’s parenting time; (12) provisions for resolving issues arising from a parent’s future relocation, if applicable;
(13) provisions for future modifications of the parenting plan, if specified events occur;
(14) provisions for the exercise of the right of first refusal, if so desired, that are consistent with the best interests of the minor child; provisions in the plan for the exercise of the right of first refusal must include: (i) the length and kind of child-care requirements invoking the right of first refusal; (ii) notification to the other parent and for his or her response; (iii) transportation requirements; and (iv) any other provision related to the exercise of the right of first refusal necessary to protect and promote the best interests of the minor child; and
(15) any other provision that addresses the child’s best interests or that will otherwise facilitate cooperation between the parents.
The court shall conduct a trial or hearing to determine a plan which maximizes the child’s relationship and access to both parents and shall ensure that the access and the overall plan are in the best interests of the child. The court shall take the parenting plans into consideration when determining parenting time and responsibilities at trial or hearing.
The court may consider, consistent with the best interests of the child, whether to award to one or both of the parties the right of first refusal. The “right of first refusal” means that if a party intends to leave the minor child or children with a substitute child-care provider for a significant period of time, that party must first offer the other party an opportunity to personally care for the minor child or children. The parties may agree to a right of first refusal that is consistent with the best interests of the minor child or children. If there is no agreement and the court determines that a right of first refusal is in the best interests of the minor child or children, the court shall consider and make provisions in its order for: (1) the length and kind of child-care requirements invoking the right of first refusal; (2) notification to the other parent and for his or her response; (3) transportation requirements; and (4) any other action necessary…
The filing of the parenting plan may be excused by the court if: (1) the parties have commenced mediation for the purpose of formulating a parenting plan; or (2) the parents have agreed in writing to extend the time for filing a proposed plan and the court has approved such an extension; or (3) the court orders otherwise for good cause shown.
The court can require the parties to attend mediation with a mediator, who is a neutral third party who tries to help the parties reach an agreement. The mediation process is used to assess each parties’ position in terms of ther minor child(ren). If an agreement still cannot be reached, then the Court can appoint certain professionals to aid in the final determination.
Representation of a child may be necessary in proceedings involving the allocation of parental responsibilities and the court may, on its own motion or that of any party, appoint an attorney to serve in one of the following capacities to address the issues the court delineates:
(1) Attorney. The attorney shall provide independent legal counsel for the child and shall owe the same duties of undivided loyalty, confidentiality, and competent representation as are due an adult client.
(2) Guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem shall testify or submit a written report to the court regarding his or her recommendations in accordance with the best interest of the child. The report shall be made available to all parties. The guardian ad litem may be called as a witness for purposes of cross-examination regarding the guardian ad litem’s report or recommendations. The guardian ad litem shall investigate the facts of the case and interview the child and the parties.
(3) Child representative. The child representative shall advocate what the child representative finds to be in the best interests of the child after reviewing the facts and circumstances of the case. The child representative shall meet with the child and the parties, investigate the facts of the case, and encourage settlement and the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The child representative shall have the same authority and obligation to participate in the litigation as does an attorney for a party and shall possess all the powers of investigation as does a guardian ad litem. The child representative shall consider, but not be bound by, the expressed wishes of the child. A child representative shall have received training in child advocacy or shall possess such experience as determined to be equivalent to such training by the chief judge of the circuit where the child representative has been appointed. The child representative shall not disclose confidential communications made by the child, except as required by law or by the Rules of Professional Conduct. The child representative shall not render an opinion, recommendation, or report to the court and shall not be called as a witness, but shall offer evidence-based legal arguments. The child representative shall disclose the position as to what the child representative intends to advocate in a pre-trial memorandum that shall be served upon all counsel of record prior to the trial. The position disclosed in the pre-trial memorandum shall not be considered evidence. The court and the parties may consider the position of the child representative for purposes of a settlement conference.
In deciding whether to make an appointment of an attorney for the minor child, a guardian ad litem, or a child representative, the court shall consider the nature and adequacy of the evidence to be presented by the parties and the availability of other methods of obtaining information, including social service organizations and evaluations by mental health professions, as well as resources for payment.