Parents are obligated to provide financial support for their minor children, oftentimes in the form of child support and/or contribution to child-related expenses. WARD FAMILY LAW, LLC, works closely with clients at the onset of their case to obtain the full financial disclosure of both parties to be able to properly and accurately calculate child support under the guidelines provided by Illinois law.
In the fall of 2016, the Illinois Legislature passed and the Governor signed a new statute that completely changes the way child support is calculated in Illinois. The new law took effect on July 1, 2017.
The law eliminates the former percentages and creates what is called the income shares approach. The statute provides reasoning “to calculate child support based upon the parent’s combined adjusted net income estimated to have been allocated to the child if the parents and children were living in an intact household.”
The Illinois Department of Health Care and Family Services established child support guidelines, which include worksheets for calculating the child support and a table (also known as a “schedule”) to show the percentage of the combined net income “the parents living in the same household in this State ordinarily spend on their children.”
Child support is generally a set sum of money paid from one parent to another parent for support of the child(ren). The basic child support obligation is calculated using the established guidelines and schedules for Illinois. All child support determinations begin by referencing these schedules, regardless of parenting time or other factors that may affect the final child support amount.
The Illinois schedule cross-references the combined net income of the parents with the number of children the parents have together. Note that the schedule utilizes net income, which is income after state and federal taxes are deducted, not gross income, which is income before taxes. The basic child support obligation is the resulting value from the schedule using the parents’ combined net incomes and the number of children. This basic child support obligation is then prorated between the parents based on their respective net incomes.
In this example, we will consider a household with a combined net income of $10,000, where both spouses contribute $5,000 to the combined net income, or 50%. Absent extenuating circumstances, each spouse would be responsible for half of the basic child support obligation from the Illinois schedule.
However, if Spouse A contributes $6,000, and Spouse B contributes $4,000, Spouse A would most likely be responsible for 60% of the basic child support obligation from the schedule, while Spouse B would be responsible for 40%.
For another example: If there are two children, and if based on the combined income of the parents, $50,000 annually is spent on the two children, and if the father has 40% of the combined income and the mother 60%, and if the father is to pay child support, he would pay 40% of the $50,000 or $20,000 annually.
(Basic child support obligation x Percent contributed to combined net income) + (Additional expenses ordered by court x Percent contributed to combined net income) = Total Child Support Obligation
The non-custodial parent is then required to pay their total child support obligation to the custodial parent. While Illinois has discarded the concept of child custody in recent laws, the term custodial parent is used in this case to refer to which parent the child resides with the most, in any non-shared parenting situation.
In a shared parenting situation, there are additional steps taken when calculating child support obligations, which will be explained in detail later.
For the first time, the new statute makes it explicitly clear that spousal maintenance/alimony received pursuant to a court order is income for child support purposes.
Also, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed voluntarily, there is a rebuttable presumption that the income is “75% of the most recent United States Department of Health and Human Services Federal Poverty Guidelines for a family of one person.” There is also “a rebuttable presumption that a minimum child support obligation of $40.00 per month per child, will be entered…”
There are additional child care expenses that can be added to the basic child support obligation. These include:
Calculating a parent’s share of these additional expenses is similar to the calculation of the basic child support obligation, except these additional expenses are not calculated from a schedule. Each parent provides an amount for any such additional expenses, and these amounts are added together. The resulting total is then prorated between the parents based on each parent’s percentage contribution to the combined net income to determine how much of the total additional expenses each parent should pay.
Each parent’s percentage of these additional expenses is added to his or her basic child support obligation, resulting in his or her total child support obligation.
In Illinois, parents are considered to have “shared parenting time” when each parent has the child(ren) for at least 146 overnights (or 40%) each year. If one parent has less than 146 overnights each year, then it is not considered “shared parenting,” and child support is calculated using the regular formula. If parents have shared parenting, the total child support obligation is calculated differently.
How to calculate parenting time allocation: Assume that the winter break from school is two weeks, the spring break is one week, and each parent gets two weeks of vacation during the summer, which leaves 45 weeks in the year. If each parent gets two weeks in the summer plus half of the winter break, then each parent starts with 21 days. A parent would then need 125 additional days to get to 146 days. If the parties alternated the spring break, then they would each have 3.5 days. Then a parent would need 121.5 overnights in a year. Divide that by 45 weeks remaining in the year, then a parent would need three overnights out of seven for the rest of the year in order to reach 146 nights.
The potential for parents to significantly argue about getting both of them to 146 nights minimum turns into a financial one rather than a consideration of what parenting plan may be best for the children. It can easily be foreseen that one parent will significantly and strenuously argue that the other parent should not reach 146 nights and the parent who wishes that will strenuously argue for it. A Judge may need to attempt to determine if the reason for seeking 146 is merely to save child support.
For a shared parenting situation, the basic child support obligation is still determined using the Illinois schedule for the number of children and the parents’ combined net incomes. However, with shared parenting, the basic child support obligation from the schedule is then multiplied by 1.5 to obtain the shared care support obligation. The 1.5 multiplier is intended to account for the cost of transportation between the parent’s respective residences and any duplicate expenses that arise with shared parenting.
The resulting shared care support obligation is prorated between the parents based on each parent’s percentage of contribution to the combined net income (as with the non-shared parenting calculation). The resulting value for each parent is called their child support obligation.
Each parent’s resulting child support obligation is then multiplied with the other parent’s [‘percentage of parenting time (i.e. the number of overnights the other parent has each year divided by 365) to produce the individual obligation for each parent.
Unlike in non-shared parenting cases where the non-custodial parent pays their obligation to the custodial parent, those in a shared parenting situation are close to having equal parenting time with their child(ren). Therefore, there is no predetermined custodial or non-custodial parent.
Instead, individual child support obligations for both parents are offset to find the difference between them. The parent who owes the greater amount of individual child support is ordered responsible for paying that difference to the parent who owes the lesser amount of individual child support.
Under the former law, the amount that an obligor parent was required to pay in child support was based simply on the obligor’s income and the number of children involved.
Under the new “income shares” model for calculating Illinois child support, the total amount of child support for which the parents are jointly responsible is calculated based on the combined net income of both parents. Once this number is determined, each parent’s share of the responsibility for providing that amount of child support is calculated based on the net incomes of the parents relative to one another.
This means that, unlike the previous law, the new child support law takes the income of the recipient of the child support into account when determining the amount of the obligor parent’s child support obligation.
Jennifer is a strategic thinker with a remarkable ability to anticipate and address potential challenges. Her attention to detail and thorough preparation were evident in every aspect of my paternity case. This meticulous approach translated into a successful resolution of establishing the father-child relationship and financial responsibility that comes with that. I felt well-represented both inside and outside the zoom courtroom.
I was referred to the firm for their expertise in handling complex business divisions during divorce proceedings. As someone entangled in a high-stakes divorce involving substantial business assets, I can attest to their unparalleled skill, strategic acumen, and unwavering commitment to securing the best possible outcome for their clients. From the business valuation to the creative distribution, thank you.
If you own a business or an interest in a business or stock options (or anything of real value related to a business) then you need to make sure that your divorce attorney knows what they’re doing. My first attorney had no idea and so I had to start over finding the right team that had extensive family law and divorce experience that I needed in Chicago. Their deep understanding of corporate structures, financial statements, and tax implications showcased a level of competence that instilled confidence throughout the entire process. They collaborated seamlessly with financial experts, forensic accountants, and other…
The firm’s negotiation skills were instrumental in reaching a favorable settlement that protected my financial interests while mitigating the emotional toll often associated with divorce proceedings. Enough said. Ward family law has the best team of experienced lawyers to get you what you want and deserve.
For anyone facing the challenging intersection of divorce and complex business matters, I wholeheartedly recommend Jennifer and Emily as legal eagles who goes above and beyond to safeguard their clients' interests.
Just as their law firm philosophy stated, Jennifer and Emily consistently maintained an open line of communication, promptly responding to my emails and keeping me informed at every step of the legal divorce process. This transparent approach not only fostered trust but also allowed me to actively participate in my case, making informed decisions with confidence.
What truly sets them apart from the other matrimonial lawyers is their keen attention to detail. They approached our unique situation with a meticulous eye, taking the time to understand our needs and concerns in getting married. The resulting prenuptial agreement felt tailor-made, a testament to that clear commitment to delivering personalized legal solutions.
My entire marriage was reactive. The proactive approach proposed by Jennifer alleviated any apprehensions I had, fostering trust in her team’s family law expertise and being able to understand her client’s needs. In the courtroom, the senior legal associate, Emily, demonstrated a command of legal strategy woven in with facts unique to my situation. The case was settled, but not without some court battles to get us there. Thank you for the fight when I needed it and the negotiation of settlement when it was time.
Zoom courtroom presence is odd, to say the least. Somehow, Emily was able to show herself as both assertive and composed in a zoom setting, instilling confidence that my interests were being fiercely defended. Divorce isn’t fun, but I can tell you it’s nice to have the right people on your side during the process. Ward family law did that for me.
I recently had the privilege of working with Jennifer - she has to be one of the most outstanding legal professionals in Chicago. I don’t write reviews often, but I am compelled to share my experience with others seeking top-notch representation during a divorce. I was referred to her - she is renowned for her expertise and dedication to families, which proved her to be an invaluable ally during a challenging period in my life that had me at risk of losing my kids. She demonstrated a profound understanding of the intricacies of divorce law. Her comprehensive knowledge of the…
If you would like an attorney to contact you for a free consultation, please complete this form.